Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Roots in the Restroom: The Lineage of Stall Walls




As much as I don't connect with the banally juvenile need to inscribe etchings and declarations on the walls of bathroom stalls...

I read them. 

And occasionally take pictures.

It's a guilty pleasure.  Like reading the tabloid headlines while waiting in the supermarket checkout line. 

Scratchings on a bathroom stall, graffiti on a rock…it seems so adolescent and classless.  Initials carved in a tree are sweet, but not much better.  It's apparent the need to mark things is ubiquitous the world over.  No matter where you go, someone with a marker or can of spray paint  "was here."  

When I was in junior high I played percussion in the school band.  Toward the end of my junior high career we received new heads for the timpani drums (the vibrating skin that stretches across the top).  Using our drumsticks, we discovered we could leave an imprint on the fresh surface, much like utensils or fingernails on leftovers in a styrofoam box (anyone who has ever had roommates knows what I'm talking about).  To leave our legacy, the graduating class all carved our initials into the new timpani heads. 
Our band teacher was not happy when he found out.  He fined us all for the graffiti.  We were in our final semester of junior high; students were not allowed to graduate unless all fines were paid.
He fined each of us $40.  Costs for brand new timpani heads start at $40!  He wasn't charging us collectively, he was charging each one of us for the cost of a new timpani head.  The rest of the percussion ensemble cowered and paid the fine.  I was not as easily subdued. 
My band teacher was prone to frustration that escalated.  My mother, band teacher, and I sat across the desk from the principal.  We ended up in the principal's office after he and I twice discussed the matter in his office privately.  

I hadn't wanted to involve my mother.  I'd never been in trouble before!  I didn't want her to know what I'd done.  I thought I was going to get plenty of heat from her about it.  Yet, in the office she sat, and strangely enough, she was on my side.
The band teacher argued that any marking on the timpani not only altered the look, but the sound.  It didn't matter if the other band boys made at etching as well.  Had I been the only one, the timpani would still need replacing.  Therefore, he was charging each boy individually for the cost of a new timpani head.

I rebutted.  Our previous timpani heads had been 15 years old.  They were filled with marks, dings, dents, and plenty of similar inscriptions from past students.  Yet, the sound they made was so unchanged we continued to use them in every concert.  Likewise, the sound of the new timpani clearly had not been degraded as he claimed since we'd been playing the timpani in class for several weeks and it was only when he saw the initials he knew they were there.  

I owned up to responsibility and amends for my actions.  Haggling like I was at a flea market in a foreign port, I offered him $2.50 for the square inch of plastic my initials scarred.  He scoffed at my incredulity.  

It was at this point the principal piped in with words like vandalism and juvenile court.  My mom seemed unfazed, inconvenienced as if the words were a few crumbs she had to brush off her blouse.  I was stunned!  

Looking back now, I understand why: a school prosecuting a minor on the honor roll for inoffensive vandalism of property that remained fully functional, and for which the student offered to pay partial restitution...  Juvenile court would have laughed at them.  At the time, however, his hefty words bore down on my 14-year-old conscience of life and future.  They frightened me.  One place I did not want to leave my mark was on a criminal record.  I knew what I had done was technically vandalism.  They had a case.  The mention of those two words--vandalism and court--broke me.  I took the $40 plea bargain.

My mom covered the cost, if only to put the whole thing to rest.  A legal battle was of no concern to her, but $40 also wasn't worth jeopardizing my upcoming graduation. 

Why did I do it in the first place?  What is this overwhelming need humans have--this deep-seeded desire to let a complete stranger with whom we share no connection know at one point our existence lead us past this place--that it becomes universally necessary to vandalize rather than purchase a postcard?  I used to think this was odd.  Then I realized people have been peeing all over history since it began.  

America was named after Amerigo Vespucci and/or Richard Ameryk.  He found a continent and made sure everyone knew "Amerigo was here."  Ceasar Chavez earned himself a long stretch of street in California.  Reverend Henry Smith settled Smithfield, Maine.  Gustave Eiffel erected the famous tower of the same name.  Lou Gehrig put his stamp on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  A Yurchenko is the most popular vault performed in gymnastics (and is done while wearing a leotard named after its inventor, Jules LĂ©otard).  Natalia Yurchenko coined the term when she became the first person to perform the vault in the early 80s.  

People, places, things, events, inventions, accomplishments, findings, creations…history is nothing if not a percolated list of people placing their marks: I discovered this; I made this; I made this famous; I am why you know this; I was the first; I was the best; I was here.

Now, I'm not saying that "John took a big one" is a declaration that will make it in the history books.  I think we expect such things to go unrecognized when we write them.  Yet, we write them anyway.  Why?

Objects in motion stay in motion; objects at rest stay at rest.  It defies the laws of inertia for an object to make the effort to write an inscription while resting on a toilet or sitting at a bar unless there is an outside force at work.  The force could be boredom, but shouldn't boredom fall under the same auspices?  A mind at rest should want to stay at rest?  

This leads me to believe the behavior stems from the same biology as reproduction and involves mastery, staking a claim, leaving a legacy.  Almost on an imperceptible, unconscious level nature is working to make sure we live on; that our legacy carries forward.  These wall inscriptions, then, become social sex.  We bees are dusting surfaces of the earth with pollinated platitudes to propagate survival of our species.

Knowing the stall walls are covered in social seed makes restroom sanitation even less savory.  But, there is some truth in that, isn't there?  Like dandelion seeds we float around this globe dropping our presence here and there, hoping someone will notice, archeologists will one day unearth the fossils of Hard Rock Cafe's walls and "Joan's an ANIMAL!!!--Vegas Bachelorette Party 2009" will make its way into history.  Even if the archeologist happens to be us returning to the same place 20 years later, we keep the glimmer of nostalgic hope it will mean something to someone someday.

As comatose as these engravings may seem, we must expect SOME response (personal or social) to come from them.  Otherwise, we would never make them--or even think to make them--in the first place!  Whether it's to shock the world with caveman scratchings of anatomy, or a moment of rebellious pleasure to prove "stick-in-the-mud" does not apply as much as everyone assumes it does, a confessional when even the nearest cathedral is still too far away, or just to let the universe know you were here; you existed, there is tremendous propulsion in the human race (even on an unconscious level) to make an impact.  To feel like your existence was not bupkis. 

I daresay it is vital and necessary to continuing life.  If our presence feels undetectable I gather we would not persist our presence very long.  What's the point?  If objects in motion stay in motion, those at rest stay at rest, then those undetectable will remain undetected. 

If the cruciality is that important to our livelihood…then who can blame these scriptors of screens, these poets of panels, these vandals who jot on joints?  Write on, Hoodlums!!

But, please be responsible and use protection.  Abstinence is best, but when one cannot abstain, greenhouse those dandelion seeds.  Prophylactic those professions to social media.  Look at me!  I'm doing it right now!  My lesson was learned.  My record's been clean since my one underage band offense.  I've become one of the foremost fornicators of word propriety there is!

Post an image on Facebook's wall rather than scratching one into China's.  Write about the end of the world on a blog instead of street corner.  Leave "For A Good Time" ads off the tile and on Craigslist.  Same impact; less clean up.

Niko wasn't just here, he IS here--2013

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Raising Raisins Right and Proper


Wouldn't it follow the best wine makers in the world would also have the best raisins?  Having the same common denominator, those two should go hand in hand.  

Yet, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the top raisin producers are the United States, Turkey, China, and Iran, while the top wine countries in the world are France, Italy, and Spain, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization.

If they’re all coming from grapes, then something here does not measure up…

And where is Japan in all this??  Wouldn't it also follow Japan would be more prevalent on the raisin frontier given their love/need to save space?  Like sweaters in a vacuum bag, raisins are the airless space-savers of food storage.  Surely, they must have a following in Japan.  Plus, raisins are a key ingredient in rice pudding.  Again, I'm just putting two and two together here. 

On a side note, raisins are just grapes dried of moisture.  Nothing else changes.  Chemically, the compounds are still exactly the same.  And yet, these dried grapes take on an entirely new name.  A name that doesn't even hint at their original past.  Dried grapes could be called gripes, changing the letter “a” to a letter “i” to indicate past tense.  They once were grapes, but now they're gripes.  Instead, they're given a completely new identity: raisin.

If that's the case, why don't other things get a completely new identity when they dry up?  Like leaves.  When leaves fall from trees they don't suddenly become feuilles.  Leaves on the ground are still referred to as leaves.  And, what about clouds?  Or pens that run out of ink?  Or nursing breasts that have run their course?  Where is their dried out identity?  Shouldn't they deserve a new defining name?   

One other thing…  A Raisin in the Sun?  What the heck is that raisin doing in the sun?  He's already a raisin.  He ain't gonna become any more raisinly than he already is by staying in the sun!  That's like giving a wave a drink of water: needless and unnecessary.

And that’s all I have to say about raisins.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Recall on Reality: Reign It In

Bodyguarding Barbie


I think it's time we stop scapegoating Barbie just because she is an inanimate object, safely mute to feeling depression or guilt.  Her plastic legs--however unnaturally shapely they be--are not Roman arches made to withstand the envy with which we dislike ourselves.  She is not some architectural design meant to hold the weight of ubiquitous physical insecurities.   

I grow weary of people talking about how Barbie's proportions are inaccurate.  Where proportion is out of whack is in how much blame we attribute a toy. 

Newsflash: NO DOLL'S PROPORTIONS HAVE EVER BEEN ACCURATE.  And that's fine.  You know why?  From an early age humans have an uncanny ability to separate fiction from reality.  Children only have a few precious years before Christmas and Easter take on a different meaning--perceptive buggers.  Even newborn babies feel safe enough to nap under a mobile because they understand the plastic butterflies are not actually attacking them.

Despite her best efforts to derail us, for half a century we've all still managed to grow up to become reasoning, rational, functioning adults.

Let's stop pretending.  (That statement is going to become ironic three sentences down.)  No one (except Valeria Lukyanova, who is quite happy in her quest) is forcing his/herself into Barbie's reality.  So, let's stop forcing our reality on her.

She is fantasy, imagination, a plaything.  How dismal is the time spent trying to extract fantasy from imaginary.  If all leisure were required to mimic reality there would be no play, no fun, no escape.  Let fantasy be, and instead, improve reality.

*He steps aside and lets Chris Crocker have his soapbox back*

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

The Skeletons in My Closet Better Shop at Bergdorf and in a Size 38


"It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice."  

When I was in third grade my teacher gave us a task.  The starter "In my 8 years of life I have learned..." was given to us and we were to fill in the rest of the statement.  

"In my 8 years of life I have learned that it's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice."  While my peers wrote "Purple gum tastes best," and "Basketball rocks," I wrote that truism.  I'd heard my father say it several times.

Our responses were sent to the local newspaper.  Select answers were being published in an exposĂ© insighting the daily reader into the life of today's third grader.  My answer was chosen to be published.

At 8-years-old, a published credit in the newspaper was a sizable, uncommon ordeal.  Neighbors approached to tell me they read my quote in the newspaper.  In some small way, I felt a little bit of celebrity distinction.  Ironically, the answer that got me published in the first place triggered the very situation it addresses.  

At the time, it was nice to be important.  These days, however, I contemplate the being nice.          

In the ultimate truth box of their mind, heart, or soul, do you think anyone believes they themselves are not a nice person?

Of course there is room for error: regrets, shame, life lessons learned over poor choices.  Even so... 

Through all the mistakes, I’ve never come across anyone who considers himself not to be a nice person.  We all see ourselves as nice people who have made bad decisions, some more than others.  Why, then, do we not see each other that way?  

It’s fascinating to me how liberally people perceive and refer to others as not nice, all the while considering ourselves--of course--to be nice.  The polarity is intriguing to me, not the hypocrisy (well, the hypocrisy too, but in this case I’m discussing the polarity).  Is private opinion or public opinion correct?  

At one point or other, every person has been perceived to not be nice*.  Yet, every person considers himself to be nice.  Therefore, either we have a society that is completely 100% nice or completely 100% not nice.  And, it’s all a matter of perspective.

Personally, I shy away from the generalization of ‘nice’ and, more so, appreciate capabilities.  Capabilities accurately tune to a person’s character while reserving the judgement associated with being ‘nice.’  It allows you to appreciate the person for what they have to offer without additional expectations.

Is this person capable of picking me up from the airport?  Can I rely on this person for a good laugh?  I know who to call if I’m feeling vindictive.  I also know who I can count on for a smile.  Life is a window shopping spree, friendship is a fitting room, and society is a gigantic closet through which you sift and piece together an outfit to surround yourself for the day.  

Somedays you need the structure of a suit.  Somedays you need the comfort of a sweater.  I would hate to go even a single day without shoes, but they do not give the same support as undergarments.  Likewise, briefs do not provide the same style as a sleek, button-down shirt.

Capabilities is about understanding what each garment was made for.  Some people are suits; they will council and motivate.  Some people are shoes; they will comfort and protect.  Others offer lift and support.  I have no use for a strand of pearls in my closet, but pearls are lovely people anyway.  Nor do I have what it takes to pull off skinny jeans, but I love when other people rock them.  And, some people you simply keep around because they make you look good.

When my mom needed a writer, she came to me.  She relied on my brother to sand and revarnish the dining room table.  When she needs a lunch partner, she calls my sister.  When my uncle came to visit and she needed someone to greet him, she did it herself.  

Even though I was home and available at the time, she took a lunch break from work to come welcome him.  She’s knows she plays hostess better than any of us.  She opened the door with a smile and a hug.  She excitedly engaged him in conversation.  She took him around and showed him where everything was.  

Does this mean my mother views me as not nice?  I hope not!  In this instance (an uncle with whom I’m not close), fawning host just wasn’t my forte.  Had she left it to me, I would have opened the door to let him in, showed him how to use the TV remote, and then sequestered myself in my room.  

I would have made him lunch had she asked.  That’s something I can handle.  But, that’s not what she needed.  She needed an engaging host and she knew she was more capable than any of us at providing it.  

Identify the positives in each person and discard the negatives.  Don’t be surprised when you go to put them on and a pair of shorts is still a pair of shorts.  They will never grow to become pants, no matter how much you wish they would.  If you expect a pair of slippers to keep your head warm in winter then you are responsible for your own headache.  Appreciate shorts for their short-ness, appreciate footwear in the way it is intended, and find a woolen hat to fit your cold head.

Everyday is an opportunity to combine, utilize, enjoy, and appreciate society’s style, functionality, color, size, texture, etc.  What’s important to remember is not all of us will have the same aesthetic:  one woman’s trashy is another woman’s treasure.  

To reign in the subjective freedom of my fashionable example, I will provide an analogy for the left brain as well by using word construction.      

People are an alphabet.  P cannot sound like H, and it would be unfair to expect it to.  I may not use Q often, but--when I do--no other letter does the job quite the same.  

Each letter offers a specific sound.  I associate with each individual letter because I recognize I need their sound to create all the words I wish to say.  I pick and choose which letters to use, and when to use them, based on what sound they are capable of producing.  

I use some more often than others because some sounds are more commonly useful.  It is natural some letters will be closer to us than others.  But, all are perfectly good letters with contributive qualities.  Therefore, they are all worthy of love.

*When I was teaching in high schools a student once cursed my testicles would shrivel up and fall off.  I doubt she saw as me as nice.